State of Washington

Ethics Advisory Committee

Opinion 91-10

Question

Is it a violation of the Code of Judicial Conduct for an attorney who sits as a pro tem court commissioner on the Family Law Motions Calendar to continue working as a pro tem commissioner while also working part-time on contract as an attorney advising Court Appointed Special Advocates (CASAs) who volunteer to provide advocacy services for children in custody and visitation disputes?

If all CASA cases are screened out so that the pro tem commissioner does not hear cases which had CASAs, would the pro tem commissioners be in violation of the Code of Judicial Conduct?

If it is not a violation to pro tem while acting as an attorney for CASA, would the pro tem violate the Code of Judicial Conduct by signing orders appointing a CASA worker to a case, knowing that in the position as the attorney for CASA, the attorney may become involved in litigation in the case directly on behalf of CASA?

Answer

It is a violation of the Code of Judicial Conduct for an attorney who sits as a pro tem court commissioner on the Family Law Motions Calendar to contract as an attorney to advise Court Appointed Special Advocates (CASAs) as those dual functions would create a conflict of interest and an appearance of impropriety under CJC Canon 2(A). Accordingly, it is not necessary to answer the last two questions.

The Supreme Court adopted a new Code of Judicial Conduct effective January 1, 2011. In addition to reviewing the ethics advisory opinions, the following should be noted:

Application III Judge Pro Tempore

Terminology “Pro Tempore Judge”
CJC 1.2

Opinion 91-10

06/10/1991

 

Privacy and Disclaimer NoticesSitemap

© Copyright 2024. Washington State Administrative Office of the Courts.

S5